← Retour au hub|ReviewPrecheck
ReviewPrecheckTexte d'avis vs facteurs publiés de la Part 465 pour les marques et équipes croissance
S'abonner

Texte d'avis vs facteurs publiés de la Part 465 pour les marques et équipes croissance

Methodology: Part 465 factors · disclosure logic · human review

Paste your review solicitation, displayed-review copy, or review-site wording before it ships. Get a scored pre-check report — is it a fake or bought review, an incentivized or employee review with no material-connection disclosure, review gating or suppression of negatives, or a company-controlled “independent” review page — based on the FTC Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465). A heads-up, not a legal opinion.

1. What the engine owns

Severity-ranked findings from pasted consumer-review wording against heuristics derived from the FTC Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465). Check families: fake / bought reviews (§ 465.2, § 465.4); undisclosed material connections in incentivized (§ 465.4) and insider / employee reviews (§ 465.5); review suppression and gating (§ 465.7); company-controlled review sites presented as independent (§ 465.6); and context advisories (celebrity testimonials, results-not-typical, platform reliance) that never invent reviewer facts. Scores dock per HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW finding (advisories never dock); a genuine incentivized review with a clear disclosure, or a model solicitation that publishes all reviews, is not docked. The rule snapshot is dated by the engine version — it is not synced with regulator pages in real time. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Explain or polish findings when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented findings, no quotes from copy you did not paste, no reviewer-identity, platform, or disclosure-render check the engine did not run.

3. What you must do

  • Review findings against your own solicitation, moderation, and disclosure practices — only you know whether a reviewer had actual experience and whether a disclosure renders conspicuously.
  • Apply fixes in your own emails, ads and pages — ReviewPrecheck never publishes or connects to a review platform or CRM.
  • Treat output as decision-support, not a consumer-reviews certification or legal advice.

4. What we deliberately do not do

  • Reviewer-identity checks, platform data lookups, or verification of how a disclosure renders on the live page — those facts live outside the pasted text.
  • Continuous monitoring of live product pages or automated publishing.
  • Compliance probabilities or enforcement-prediction numbers — outside the FTC nobody can compute what it will decide.
  • Legal review — Part 465 checks read wording patterns, not your full obligations. Non-US regimes appear as labeled advisories only; regulated campaigns need a qualified professional.

Heuristic pre-check — not a consumer-reviews certification or legal advice. No reviewer-identity, platform, disclosure-render, or enforcement verification performed.

Ouvrir le studio

Ce résultat vous a-t-il été utile ?Commentaires