← Voltar ao hub|ReviewPrecheck
ReviewPrecheckTexto das avaliações vs. fatores publicados da Parte 465 para marcas e equipes de growth
Assinar

Texto das avaliações vs. fatores publicados da Parte 465 para marcas e equipes de growth

Methodology: Part 465 factors · disclosure logic · human review

Paste your review solicitation, displayed-review copy, or review-site wording before it ships. Get a scored pre-check report — is it a fake or bought review, an incentivized or employee review with no material-connection disclosure, review gating or suppression of negatives, or a company-controlled “independent” review page — based on the FTC Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465). A heads-up, not a legal opinion.

1. What the engine owns

Severity-ranked findings from pasted consumer-review wording against heuristics derived from the FTC Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465). Check families: fake / bought reviews (§ 465.2, § 465.4); undisclosed material connections in incentivized (§ 465.4) and insider / employee reviews (§ 465.5); review suppression and gating (§ 465.7); company-controlled review sites presented as independent (§ 465.6); and context advisories (celebrity testimonials, results-not-typical, platform reliance) that never invent reviewer facts. Scores dock per HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW finding (advisories never dock); a genuine incentivized review with a clear disclosure, or a model solicitation that publishes all reviews, is not docked. The rule snapshot is dated by the engine version — it is not synced with regulator pages in real time. Demo is labelled Rule-based — never silent mock.

2. What optional AI may do

Explain or polish findings when a key is configured. Upstream failure returns 502. No invented findings, no quotes from copy you did not paste, no reviewer-identity, platform, or disclosure-render check the engine did not run.

3. What you must do

  • Review findings against your own solicitation, moderation, and disclosure practices — only you know whether a reviewer had actual experience and whether a disclosure renders conspicuously.
  • Apply fixes in your own emails, ads and pages — ReviewPrecheck never publishes or connects to a review platform or CRM.
  • Treat output as decision-support, not a consumer-reviews certification or legal advice.

4. What we deliberately do not do

  • Reviewer-identity checks, platform data lookups, or verification of how a disclosure renders on the live page — those facts live outside the pasted text.
  • Continuous monitoring of live product pages or automated publishing.
  • Compliance probabilities or enforcement-prediction numbers — outside the FTC nobody can compute what it will decide.
  • Legal review — Part 465 checks read wording patterns, not your full obligations. Non-US regimes appear as labeled advisories only; regulated campaigns need a qualified professional.

Heuristic pre-check — not a consumer-reviews certification or legal advice. No reviewer-identity, platform, disclosure-render, or enforcement verification performed.

Abrir o estúdio

Este resultado foi útil?Feedback